Defenders / Iraq / Delsoz Khalaf Case № HM-IQ-2026-002
Defender · Iraq

DELSOZ
KHALAF

Delsoz Khalaf leads a human rights organisation in Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan Region of Iraq. She faces two criminal complaints filed by a Workers' Union official after she questioned conflicting labour statistics and was targeted in a defamation case.

Under restriction Iraq
Country
Iraq
Role
Labour rights defender
Status
Pre-trial · no verdict
HM-IQ-2026-002
Portrait on file Verified
DocumentedViolations
Denial of legal counsel Judicial harassment Press freedom violation
Verified · 12 May 2026HuMENA Editorial
Approved
§ 01 · The case

The arrest, and what followed.

Background and Work

Delsoz Khalaf is the director of the Dabin Organisation for Democratic Development and Human Rights, a human rights organisation based in Sulaymaniyah Governorate in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. The organisation focuses on labour rights advocacy, women's rights, and anti-corruption work. Its methods include monitoring rights violations in the workplace, raising awareness among workers about their legal entitlements, and publicly challenging misinformation disseminated by labour institutions and government bodies.

Khalaf's work has brought her into direct conflict with the Workers' Union in Sulaymaniyah, a body that represents organised labour in the governorate but has itself been the subject of scrutiny over conflicting public data and allegations of misrepresentation. Her organisation has repeatedly questioned discrepancies between official union publications and statements made by union leadership in media appearances.

The Initial Dispute and Retaliation

In late 2022, the head of the Workers' Union in Sulaymaniyah sent an official letter to the Independent Human Rights Commission in the Kurdistan Region, Sulaymaniyah office. The letter claimed that the Dabin Organisation "trades in issues related to workers" and does not operate according to human rights principles. The letter provided no supporting evidence for these allegations.

Khalaf responded by filing a defamation complaint against the union head. The case was closed due to insufficient evidence. Shortly after that closure, the union head filed two separate criminal complaints against Khalaf.

The Charges

The first complaint accuses Khalaf of defamation under Article 433 of Iraqi Penal Code No. 111 of 1969. It stems directly from her earlier defamation case against the union official. The second complaint is based on Facebook posts she published in which she raised questions about conflicting labour statistics. In the posts, she compared figures published by the Workers' Union with different figures cited by the union head in televised interviews. She asked why the data did not align.

The union head alleges that these posts constitute insult and belittlement. Khalaf is charged under Article 2 of the Law to Prevent the Misuse of Telecommunications Equipment in the Kurdistan Region, No. 6 of 2008, a vaguely worded statute frequently used to prosecute journalists, activists, and human rights defenders for online expression.

Arrest Warrant and Court Proceedings

On 31 July 2023, Khalaf was questioned at the Azmar police station in Sulaymaniyah after an arrest warrant was issued against her. A police officer recorded her written statement and informed her of the two criminal complaints. The investigating judge released her on bail of IQD 2,000,000—approximately EUR 1,400—the same day. She requested copies of the case files and evidence but was refused.

On 17 August 2023, the investigating judge referred both criminal complaints to the Sulaymaniyah Misdemeanour Court. Khalaf plans to contest the referral. She faces up to five years in prison on each charge, in addition to fines.

Legal Context and Patterns of Repression

The laws invoked against Khalaf—Article 433 of the Iraqi Penal Code and Article 2 of the Kurdistan Region's telecommunications misuse law—are routinely deployed to silence critics, journalists, and human rights defenders. The telecommunications statute in particular has been criticised for its sweeping and imprecise language, which allows for criminalisation of legitimate expression under the guise of preventing "misuse."

The charges against Khalaf follow a common pattern: a public official or institution is criticised; the critic is accused of defamation or online insult; and criminal proceedings are initiated not to secure justice but to silence further scrutiny. The denial of access to case files and evidence at the investigative stage compounds the due-process violations inherent in such proceedings.

Sources on file with HuMENA EditorialReading time · 6 minutes

She questioned conflicting labour statistics in public posts and now faces five years in prison for internet misuse and defamation.
HuMENA Editorial · 2026

Take action.

Ways to act on Delsoz Khalaf's case — chosen contextually from country, status, and your location.

Editorial · Provenance

Compiled by HuMENA's Iraq research team from primary documentation, public filings, family-supplied legal documents, and confidential partner reporting. Editorial responsibility: HuMENA Editorial Board.

HuMENA Editorial Retrieved · 2026-05-12
Editorial sign-off · published
First published · 12 May 2026  ·  Last verified · 12 May 2026 Take-down requests · takedowns@humena.org